Math = Love: Fabulous Function Machines

## Wednesday, February 26, 2014

### Fabulous Function Machines

This is a lesson I taught way back in early January.  I've put off writing it because I want to make sure I do it justice.  Do you ever have a lesson that you are just insanely proud of?  This is that lesson for me.  (Feel free to link to your lesson or tell us about it in the comments!  Sharing is caring!)

[Warning: This is probably the longest post I've ever written.  It's also got a ridiculous amount of photos and videos. I hope you will take the time to read through it and offer your feedback in the comments, though.  If you were coming to my class to observe me teach, this is the lesson I would want you to see.  I know there are tons of things I could do better that you can see that I can't.  I'm also very interested in hearing your ideas on how I can capture the spirit of this activity and use it to engage students throughout the year.]

Let me set the stage so you can see where this falls in my Algebra 1 curriculum.  At this point in the year, my Algebra 1 kiddos have reviewed the pre-algebra basics of the real number system, integer operations, and the order of operations.  We learned exponent rules and named polynomials.  We're experts (hopefully) at distributing and undistributing (factoring) expressions.  Equations have been written and solved.  Inequalities have been solved and graphed (in one variable.)  Students have learned the definitions of relations and functions.  We've also discussed domain and range and independent and dependent variables.  We can graph points on the coordinate plane.  It's now time to delve into function notation, expand on the idea of a function machine, and graph functions by making an input/output table.  We haven't discussed slope or looked at the difference between linear and non-linear functions.  Those will come in the next unit.

When we discuss how to differentiate between a relation that is a function and a relation that is not a function, I introduced the concept of a function machine.  Humans like functional machines.  We like to be able to predict what's going to happen.  When we put bread in our toasters, we expect toast.  If we put a toaster strudel in our toaster, we expected a warm, toasted toaster strudel.  If we put a bagel in our toaster, we expect a toasted bagel.  Because we know the function of a toaster (to toast things), we can predict the output based on the input.

What if this wasn't the case?  What if I put in a piece of bread, expecting toast, and a toasted poptart comes out?  What if I sometimes get toast and sometimes get a poptart?  Life would certainly be exciting, but nobody in their right mind would buy that toaster for anything more than novelty purposes.  If I'm eating breakfast and I like poptarts, I might not be too broken-hearted if I put in bread and got out a poptart.  But, what if I'm wanting to make a BLT on toasted bread?  I definitely don't want to eat my bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwiched between two strawberry poptarts with lots of icing.  Yuck!  (And, for the record, my BLT would be made with these.  I've never actually eaten actual bacon.)

After introducing the concept of a toaster as a function machine, I ran across an amazing comment on Sarah Rubin's Everybody is a Genius blog.  The comment was from Ms. Mac/Mrs. G.  And, she suggested showing students that a toaster allows several inputs with the same output.  But, it doesn't allow one input to have several outputs.  For example, if I put wheat bread in my toaster, I get out toast.  If I put rye bread in my toaster, I get out toast.  If I put pumpernickel bread in my toaster, I still get out toast.  (I've never actually eaten rye bread or pumpernickel bread.  I guess I need to get out more!)  But, if I put in a bagel, there is no way that I could ever get anything but a bagel out of the toaster.  There is zero possibility of getting scrambled eggs or a waffle.  Every input has exactly one output.  I love this addition, and I think it will really help my students.  I'm definitely adding this to my unit next year!

I guess I made a pretty big deal out of my toaster analogy before Christmas.  After Christmas break, I asked the following question without really thinking about the whole toaster thing.

Me: "Guys, I brought some function machines from my house today.  Don't you have function machines at your house?"
Student: "Did you bring your toaster?"
Me: "No... I guess a toaster is a function machine, but I brought a different type of function machine today."

Now, remember the flip chutes I made this summer?  They are made out of saltine boxes.  Though, I'm pretty sure I was supposed to make them out of empty juice cartons.  They've been sitting in my house for months, just waiting to make their debut in this lesson.

 My Flip Chute Function Machines

I'm building up to the idea of function notation.  Last year, my Algebra 1 students had a terrible time wrapping their brains around function notation.  The whole idea behind this lesson is to try to avoid the frustration and confusion that seemed to persist last year with my students.  Why is the function notation necessary?  Because humans don't just like predictable things.  They like things with names.  Here's what I told my kids:

Me: "Humans love to name things.  We have an obsession with naming the things around us.  We name our children.  We name our pets.  We name our cards."
Student: "We name our guns." (That's news to me.  Of course, I don't actually own a gun.)
Another Student: "We name our shoes."  (Yeah, I don't do that either.)
A Third Student: "I give names to my favorite t-shirts."  (That is yet another thing I don't name.)
A Fourth Student: "I named my straightener."

So, apparently, humans like to name things even more than I realized!  Mathematicians like to name things, too.  After all, they are humans.  Mathematicians are also fans of parsimony.  If they name something, they want to name it in the easiest and shortest way possible.  Therefore, usually the name of a function is notated by a single letter of the alphabet.  The word function starts with f, so a lot of times, mathematicians simply call a function f.

I have to function machines, so I named one f and the other g.  To further emphasize that f and g are just the name of the function, I gave them more traditional names, too.  Francine.  And George.  After I gave them these names, I realized that these are both the names of characters on Arthur.  I loved to watch Arthur when I was growing up.  I can remember being so scared of going to the third grade.  I mean, what if my teacher ended up being as mean as Mr. Ratburn?  Okay, enough with the reminiscing.

Once I realized that I was channeling Arthur with my names, I made a comment about it to my students.

Me: "I guess I'm channeling Arthur today."
Student 1: "Who?"
Me: "You know!  Arthur, the aardvark."
Student 1: "What?"
Me: "Have you really never seen that show on television?"
Student 2: "Oh, I know what show you're talking about!  What did you say he was again?"
Me: "Arthur was an aardvark."
Student 2: "He was an aardvark?!?  I always thought he was a bear!"

I didn't realize that giving my functions names was going to lead to so many issues.  My 6th period class decided to rename George as Georgeio.  Another student came in at lunch to give me her opinion on the names.  "The function machines should be named George and Francisco.  Then, they can be gay, Italian lovers.  Italians make the best lovers.  I know this."  I didn't even respond to that comment.  I did not want any more details.

And, let's not forget to mention the fact that Francine is taller than George.  One of my classes assumed that George and Francine were dating.  And, Francine is taller than George.  The girl is taller than the guy.  Oh, what outrage!

Next, it was time to take some notes over function notation.  These notes were heavily influenced by (read: stolen from) Everybody is a Genius.  We labeled each part of a function in function notation.  And, then we practiced evaluating functions using a function machine.

I'm going to be really honest.  After going over the parts of a function, my Algebra 1 kids were VERY confused.  But, after we worked through the two examples with the function machines at the bottom, light bulbs started going off.  "Oh, that's what that means!"

 Function Machine / Function Notation Booklet Foldable - Outside

Inside the foldable, students were given two new functions to evaluate for various inputs.

 Function Machine / Function Notation Booklet Foldable - Inside

I included some problems where students added functions and found the composition of functions.  Normally, I would have skipped over these because they are not tested in Algebra 1, but I'm slowly starting to work in increasing the rigor of my Algebra 1 class in preparation for Common Core.  I also included two problems at the bottom where students had to evaluate the function for a different variable.

On the right side of the inside of the page, I include 3 sample EOI questions for students to solve.  I want my students to be familiar with how the questions will be phrased on their end-of-instruction exams.

This took probably 2/3 of our 50-minute class period.  For the last third of class, we started a hands-on activity using my shower curtain coordinate plane and the function machines.

Before class, I prepared five pairs of functions.  Each pair of functions f and g were written on a post-it note.  Since I have a limited domain and range on my shower curtain, I prepared cards for each ordered pair of the function that fit my restricted domain and range.

 Baggies of Function Cards

Here's a close-up of the cards in one bag.  The post-it note is a reminder for me.  It tells me what functions to write on the SMART Board.  One one side of the cards (cut out of card stock), students are told what to solve for.  For example, if a student picks up a g(2) card, they know that they are finding the output that results from putting 2 into g.  The resulting output is written on the other side of the card.

 Input/Output Cards for Function Machines

To give students an element of choice, I laid out all of the cards on the desk.  Students were instructed to pick a card up off the desk and return to their seat.  At their seats, they have calculators, dry erase boards, markers, and erasers.  The students were to evaluate the correct function for the given value of x.

 Students choose a card to evaluate.

If a student picked up the f(3) card, they would return to their seats and substitute 3 in for x in the function f(x) = 2x-3.  They should get an output value of 2(3)-3 = 6-3 = 3 if all their work was done correctly.  Once they have an answer, they must go back to the function machine and feed the problem to the function machine.  This is their input.  They feed the input into Francine because they were asked to plug the 3 into f

 Putting the card into the function machine.

This is where things get cool.  Upon placing the f(3) card in the function machine, the function machine will flip the card over so that it comes out reading 3.  To the students, it is MAGIC!

 Function Machine Output

I would LOVE to set up a video camera to capture my students' faces the first time they put a card in the function machine.  Their expressions are priceless!  Of course, they soon realize that the answer is written on the back of the card.  And, all the function machine does is flip the card over.  Even after discovering how it works, they still seem to love it.  I might have seen one or two kids all day forgo feeding their cards into the function machine and just flip it over to check their answer instead.

I like that this got my students checking their answer, and I hope that it reinforced the idea of inputs and outputs. If you've never seen a flip chute in action, I made a short video.  I've never really done anything like this before so I'm not sure it's that great, but I hope it will give you a better idea of the process.  Don't worry.  It's not that long of a video!  (If you're reading this via a RSS reader, you may need to click through to view the video file.)

After checking their answer, students now had to graph their input and output as an ordered pair on the coordinate plane.  My giant coordinate plane was put in the floor for this activity.

 Giant Coordinate Plane

To plot the points, I created points out of some giant foam stars that my sister had given me.  She had used part of them for an art project.

 Ordered Pair Stars for Giant Coordinate Plane

To further emphasize function notation, I labeled the stars with generic ordered pairs.  (1, f(1))  or (5, g(5)).

I was hoping that students would make a connection between the fact that f(0) means the output of f when the input is 0.  I guess I didn't do the best job of explaining this on Day 1 because my students did really well until we got to the graphing part.

Instead of nice linear functions, our attempts usually ended up looking a little something like this.

 Graphing Mishap

After graphing each point, students picked up a new card and repeated the process. They placed the cards that had been graphed on top of the function machines to avoid further confusion.  Once all the ordered pairs had been found and graphed, we had a class discussion.

 Students discard cards after evaluating and graphing.

What stars look like they are in the wrong place to you?  A student would pick a star that they believed was incorrect.  And, as a class, we would evaluate the function for that value and determine the correct place for it to go.  Sometimes the star had been placed correctly.  Most of the time, however, students made the exact same mistake.  (3, f(3)) would be placed on (3, 3).  (-2, g(-2)) would be placed at (-2, -2).  Students were seeing the input of the function and were confusing that with the output.

Here's an example of some mis-placed stars.

 Mis-placed Stars

Eventually, after some hard work, we concluded that all the stars were now in their right places.

 Corrected Graph

Students were shocked to discover that the points formed two lines!  Will this always happen?  Students were convinced that sometimes they would make lines.  Other times they would make X's.  After graphing one pair of functions, time was up.

I felt like we had made some progress, but I knew we had so much more to go.

Enter Day 2.  We started off class by watching the Meat-A-Morphosis: An Introduction to Functions video from youtube.

If you haven't seen this video before, take seven and a half minutes and just do it!  I told my students that we were going to watch a movie, and they were instantly excited. I show lots of math songs and short youtube clips, but I tell my students that I don't believe in movies.  They think that we should be watching feature films before every single holiday.  Ummm....no.  I have way too many exciting mathematical things to share with them.  I don't have time for us to watch Finding Nemo.

They soon realize that we are watching another math video, so their excitement fades.  When the music starts, the complaints start up again.  "How old is this movie you're making us watch?!?"  "I don't know.  Just watch and see."  The girls ooh and aah over how cute the little chickens are.  The class collectively gasps when the (spoiler alert) chickens are chopped up to make chicken nuggets.  "Why are you showing us this?"  "Wait!  You're a vegetarian.  Why are you showing us a video about meat?"  "Guys!  I think she's trying to turn us into vegetarians!"  No, I'm trying to turn you into mathematicians.  At the end of the video, one particularly opinionated student said, "Some of the things I see in here scare me."

At this point, I'm still frustrated over my students' struggle with function notation from the previous day.  How do I fix this?  I know!  We'll do an example problem, and I'll force them to use function notation an obnoxious number of times!

 Graphing Functions On The Coordinate Plane - INB Page

I gave the class a function to graph in function notation.  And, I also gave them their inputs, the integers from -5 to 5.  Students had to write the output in function notation, the output as a number, the ordered pair in function notation, and the ordered pair using only numbers.  We did the first two lines of the table.  Then, I gave students several minutes to work.  We would check their work, and they would continue on.  It was time-consuming, but I think it was a positive learning experience.

It was awesome to see students start to make connections.  Some realized they could very easily fill in the function notation columns.  Others noticed that the numerical output increased by two every time.  I walked around the room, pointing at student work, congratulating them on finding patterns.  We graphed the ordered pairs, and they formed a line!

With about fifteen to twenty minutes in class, we once again tried graphing functions using the function machines, cards, stars, and shower curtain coordinate plane.  When students looked confused, I reminded them of the function notation we had just used earlier that day in our notebook.  That seemed to help some.  But, I still had some very frustrated kiddos who could not figure out how to pick out which star to use or where to place it on the coordinate plane.

I was starting to write off this whole exercise as a failure.  Maybe I am just terrible at teaching function notation.  Maybe my kids are just doomed to never understand this.  I wasn't about to give up, though.  My students were going to understand function notation one way or another!

The next day, I decided we were going to spend our entire 50-minute period graphing functions.  If we continually graphed, checked our work, discussed discrepancies, and tried again, they were bound to have to get it!  I had students open their notebooks to our pages on function machines and function notation to use as a reference.

 Function Notation INB Pages

My students were rocking the process of evaluating the functions.  They were checking their answers using the function machines.  Life was good.  Well, life was good until they got to the stars.  I decided to just position myself by the stars and help students with the graphing process.  They were going to get this!

After helping student after student find their correct star, I had an epiphany.  They already have the card in their hand that has the output written in function notation on one side and the output written in numerical notation on the other side.  Why don't I have them use this card to graph their ordered pairs?!

My conversation with students went something like this.

Student: "I can't figure out which star I need!"
Me: "Well, what was your input?"
Student: "My input was 2, and my output was 1.  But, I don't see a star labeled (2,1)."
Me: "Do you remember how we had two different ways of writing the output in our notes?"
Student: "Yes."
Me: "Well, if your card says f(2), you need to find a star that also has f(2) in the ordered pair."

 Finding the Correct Star

Problem solved.  Find the star that matches the card.

This was great except for the fact that they still wanted to put the (2, f(2)) star on (2, 2).  Every.  Single.  Time.

It was time for a second epiphany.

Me: "So, your output was f(2)?"
Student: "Yes."
Me: "And, what was the numerical output that you got when you plugged 2 into the function?"
Student: "When I plugged in 2, I got 1."
Me: "So, f(2) is 1?"
Student: "Yes, I just said that."
Me: "So, you're saying that f(2) is equal to 1?"
Student: "Yes. f(2) equals 1."
Me: "If f(2) equals 1, then I can replace the f(2) with 1.  And, that will tell me where to graph the ordered pair."

 Star With Ordered Pair In Function Notation

At this point, I made a show of flipping the card over several times.  I would show them that (2, f(2)) was the exact same as (2, 1).  After all, they had just told me that both sides of the card meant the same thing.

 Star With Ordered Pair in Numerical Notation

All of a sudden, my students were graphing points like nobody's business.  They didn't need my help to find their stars.  And, they certainly didn't need my help to graph their ordered pairs.  It was so fun to watch them match the cards with the stars and then lay the cards on top of the stars.  They would flip the card over just like I had shown them in order to graph their ordered pair.  Success!

My students were able to successfully graph horizontal lines and quadratic functions using the function machines as well.  We ended up calling f(x) = 3 the Spam equation.  No matter what our input, 3 (spam) always comes out.  (If you're confused by this, you should really go back and watch the Meat-A-Morphosis video.  I promise; you'll be much less confused!)

So, why do I love this lesson so much?

It's hands-on.  It got my kids out of their seats.  It was self-checking.  It was a safe environment to make mistakes.  When students point out that they think (3, f(3)) is in the wrong place, nobody knows who graphed that point unless the student announces that it was their star.  Each student worked at their own pace.  It was discussion-provoking.  Students were craving vocabulary words like slope and y-intercept that we had yet to learn.  They were asking questions, making predictions.  "I bet this one makes a line, too!"  After, we graphed a quadratic, one student wanted to know how he could tell from the equation if the graph would make a straight line or a parabola.  I also felt like I could differentiate this activity for my students.  If f(x) was a quadratic and g(x) was linear, I could push my advanced students toward solving the f(x) cards, and my students who needed more support could be further practicing linear functions with the g(x) cards.

Basically, I want this to be what my classroom is like every single day.

1. I have been looking for a hands-on activity on Function Notation. I am looking forward to trying this.

1. If you try it, please let us know how it goes!

2. You are right to be proud of this lesson. It is simply amazing! Thank you for sharing all you have done in your classroom. Your students are lucky to have you.

1. Thanks, Julie!

3. Oh, goodness, how I love that video. When I found it, I was stuck between wanting to show it to my 8th graders and being afraid it was too traumatizing. I didn't want kids running home and telling their parents of the horrible video I made them watch! I compromised by hyping it up with, "I'm not sure you guys can handle this, so I don't really know if I should show it to you…" and then the watching of it was on their hands. ;)

1. This is priceless!

4. You've inspired yet again. I am going to try to rework it for inequalities, so it flips the sign when multiplying/dividing by a negative.

5. Hi, your students are blessed to have such a teacher. What a tremendous amount of work you put into it. I'm just reading it and it took me some time. : ) When and if you have time, could you please email the forms? I couldn't get it to work from my computer at school. Thank you in advance.

1. Just e-mailed them to you. Let me know if you don't receive them!

6. "she suggested showing students that a toaster allows several inputs with the same output. "

This is a bit flaky or shaky statement and/or analogy

because "toast" is at a different level of abstraction than bread

If we say that the function of the toaster is to create toasted or heated-up things then if we put in thing A we get out heated-up thing A

When you go on to the range and circle all those heated-up breads as "toast" it is you that you are re-interpreting the function of the machine - why dont you go on to the domain and circle all those breads as bread?

Thats the power of abstraction 5 is 5 is 5

we dont have a blue 5 or a red 5 etc

The physical object can be interpreted differently according to the microscope we put.

and that's the danger of particularizing math with analogies

1. The point of the analogy is to say that something happens to the bread to make the toast. Whilst the toast is still bread by the human definition it has "transformed" into something else... or something with a different name [toast] and therefore the range is the toasted version of the domain.
When you put a number through a function machine you get another number out, it's not the same number but it's still a number... a "heated up" number.

As for the use of blue 5 or red 5... you're just getting ridiculously picky. If I put a blue 5 into a function then the output will be blue if I choose it to be. It could be a rainbow gradient if I so please.

7. Started to see a few lightbulbs go off with this activity today, so thank you! Wanted to add for bigger classes (mine are all 24-31)...Instead of doing the activity with the whole class, it worked better for me to split the class into two groups. I gave one group book practice and worked on this activity with the other group. I spent about 20-25 with each group. While there were behavior/non-engagement issues with each method (whole class v. groups), there were far less with groups!

8. Are you familiar with Heywood Banks? He is a comedic singer/songwriter. His signature song is "Toast". I play it for my students after the initial introduction to functions and the use of the toaster analogy.

1. I'm not familiar with that artist or song. But, I imagine that this helps the concept really stick in students' brains. Great idea!

9. Hi, I am currently a teacher education student, and not an actual teacher. However, I have an assignment to teach an 8th grade lesson and I got to choose what to teach and how to teach it, but I was struggling. I then came across this post and it has helped me so much! I am posting the link to it and siting you on my lesson plan. I am excited to try to implement this when teaching my peers and getting their feedback on it. It is such a great idea and your students are very lucky to have a teacher so devoted! Thank you for the inspiration!

1. That's awesome that you're already looking online for resources while still in college! Hope the lesson goes well for you! Teaching math really is the best job ever. :)

10. I am a 7th grader in an 8th grade math class at my school. I was gone today, so my teacher gave me the function machines and function notation worksheet in class. This sight helped my learn the concept clearly.

1. Glad I could help :)

11. Thank you so much for sharing your teaching ideas :) God bless you!

1. You're very welcome!

12. can you please solve for me f(x)=2x-5 if f(x-1)?

1. f(x) = 2(x) - 5. Replace (x) with (x-1). 2(x-1)-5

13. This is a fun idea! How did you make your giant coordinate plane?

1. Dollar store shower curtain + electrical tape + duct tape + a lot of time and coordination :)

14. I want to thank you for posting your lesson. I am going to utilize it most of it when we get back to school after Thanksgiving week. I look forward to seeing how my students respond.

1. You're very welcome! Please let me know how it goes!

15. How did you make your function machine?

1. I found a PDF template online. Another commenter said they found a youtube video online that showed how to make one.

16. I found a video online called, "How to make a flip chute, and just followed the directions. You will need a couple of milk/ juice cartons, strong tape and card stock. Once I made the first one, the second one was easy to create.

1. Thanks for the tip!

17. Hello,
I was wondering when you make the functions and the cards do you use the same input for each function and they all just have different outputs. I guess I am confused on what is in each baggie.

1. I use the inputs that match the domain and range of my graph. Each baggie is different because the outputs depend on the specific function.

18. Hi there,
Where did you find your giant coordinate plane?

1. I made it out of a shower curtain and duct tape. Time consuming, but worth it!

2. Okay, perfect! Thank you so much.

19. Do you have any recommendations for when given the output - find the input. Example: Given f(x)=2x+3 find f(x)=13.

20. OK, so I know this is super old, but a quick suggestion on how to get them to understand input/output was a vending machine. You can have multiple buttons that give you the same soda, as long as they're all labeled correctly it makes sense and is predictable. But if you have a button that gives you Sprite half the time and Ginger Ale the other half, you'll be unhappy (thus, not a function!). I made a mapping diagram using this example and it really helped kids. :)

1. I've used this analogy before, too. Super helpful!